Comparison: Ontological vs. Non-Ontological States
| Aspect | Gurmukh (Ontological Self) | Manmukh (Non-Ontological Self) |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Identity | Anchored in universal consciousness (Aatma). Self -Aware | Defined by ego (Haumai) and material attachments. Fused with mental content , conditioned sense of self |
| Emotional State | Equanimity and resilience. Contentment Self compassion Emotional regulation |
Anxiety, fear, and emotional instability. Dukh Self absorbed |
| Relationships | Compassionate and harmonious. | Self-centered and conflict-driven. |
| View of Reality | Unified and non-dualistic (Ik Oankar), impermance, eternal-ever-presence-Now | Fragmented and dualistic (Dooja Bhaav). Caught in psychological cycles Psychophyisological impact |
| Alignment | Acts in harmony with Hukam. In alignment and total consent of the unfolding |
Resists natural flow, causing inner and outer chaos. Wanting things to be different |
| Fear of Death | Accepts death as a transition to eternal consciousness oneness. | Misidentfcation of self, manifesting in anguish, worry, obsessional, sensually driven .Fears death as ultimate loss. |
Implications
- For Life: The Gurmukh experiences life as a sacred flow, while the Manmukh feels trapped in a cycle of desire and dissatisfaction.
- For Emotional Well-Being: The Gurmukh’s emotional coherence promotes peace, while the Manmukh’s dissonance fosters inner turmoil.
- For Relationships: The Gurmukh fosters unity, while the Manmukh perpetuates division.
- For Death: The Gurmukh transitions fearlessly, while the Manmukh clings to life with dread.
This contrast underscores the profound implications of living as a Gurmukh, rooted in ontological truth, versus as a Manmukh, bound by illusions of separation and impermanence.
(c) 2024 D S Panesar
Presenting Gurmat Psychology Series